Hedge Fund Gumshoe
A google search just won’t cut it.
Randy Shain, executive vice president of First Advantage Investigative Services in New York, has to use a lot more online and manual search methods when he investigates hedge funds for his funds of hedge funds clients. Funds of funds managers want to know if there are any skeletons in their closets, such as criminal charges and lawsuits, before they trust hedge fund managers with their money.
Shain begins his investigations with a public records search to verify the fund manager’s credentials—his work history, where he went to school and making sure that the information on his CV is accurate. “I want to make sure what they say on their CVs is true and find any gaps in work history,” says Shain.
He gets regulatory records from the Securities & Exchange Commission and other regulatory agencies to see if there have been any complaints filed against the manager.
Shain also uses for pay news services like Lexis-Nexis, Factiva, Westlaw and Dialog to track down information.
He does a complete search of all court records, from civil, criminal, bankruptcy and estate courts. This requires much more digging than just finding online records which Shain says only “give rudimentary information.”
He does a manual search of court records, retrieving documents that get to the heart of what the case is. “We look through the whole complaint,” he says. “It will say what the charges and all the allegations are against the fund, not just the basic information,” he says.
Shain also conducts interviews with people identified in the public records as business and professional contacts of the manager he’s investigating.
What’s the most satisfying part of the job? “I feel most pride when I discover a gap in someone’s employment exists and I can find out what they did during the gap,” says Shain.
The reasons aren’t always terrible, such as someone having been in jail, Shain explains.
“Sometimes it’s just a woman who had a baby and took a couple of years off from the workforce.”
Shain complains that in today’s resumes, people will often say they worked at a job from, say, 2002-2004, without putting down the month they started and left. “It can make for unaccounted for time,” he explains. A person might really have held a job from December 2002 through January 2004, which leaves a lot of time unaccounted for.
“When they say 2002 to 2004 it’s an easy way to make it seem like a career has not been interrupted and sometimes that’s not true,” he says.
He admits that he’s a bit jaded now, saying “I’ve seen just about everything.” Only one recent discovery really surprised him. Shain was investigating a person who said he was a full-time hedge fund manager seeking capital from a fund of funds. Shain was interviewing someone he thought was a former colleague of the person, who said “what do you mean by former, he’s still here.” and made the discovery that the manager really held down a full time job and was not running the hedge fund full time. “He said he intended to run the fund full time when he got the money,” says Shain.. Needless to say, he didn’t get any from Shain’s client.

